![]() |
||||
In Touch With 42 |
||||
Jeffrey E. Barnett, Psy.D. |
||||
Dear Division 42 Colleagues and Friends, The members of the APA Recordkeeping Guidelines Revision Task Force are: The mission and charge of each task force is to: An initial $200 funding for each task force has been provided to cover conference calls. The possibility of additional funding for attendance of a liaison to attend meetings associated with this work will be considered after a specific request is submitted to the Division 42 Executive Committee, however, preference will be given to those already planning to attend meetings if possible. Division 42 member, Ken Pope, shares the following information from the article "Payment-Related Lawsuits Can Often Be Averted" by Eve Bender in the American Psychiatric Association's *Psychiatric News* (vol., #2). Several suggestions for addressing overdue bills and collections issues are provided. They appear to be equally of value for psychologists as well. They include: 1) Payment policies and procedures regarding collections should be given to all patients during the first treatment session. 2) Outstanding balances should be addressed as soon as they arise. 3) The decision to pursue an outstanding balance must be made by the psychiatrist who treated the patient and never a member of the office staff or a billing agency contracted by the psychiatrist to collect payments. 4) When disclosing information to a collection agency, the patient's confidentiality must be first and foremost in the psychiatrist's mind. Psychiatrists should disclose only the minimum amount of information necessary to collect in order to avoid breaching a patient's confidentiality. 5) Covered providers under the privacy rule of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act should have business-associate agreements in place with collections agencies or attorneys who are hired to collect on outstanding bills. The American Hospital Association's 2003 guidelines, "Hospital Billing and Collection Practices," are posted online at www.hospitalconnect.com/aha/key_issues/bcp/content/guidelinesfinalweb.pdf. Psychologists are also referred to their relevant state laws that may impact how collections are handled. In addition we should each be familiar with the sections of the APA Ethics Code relevant to fees, financial arrangements, and collections. These include Standards 3.10 Informed Consent, 4.10 Maintaining Confidentiality, 4.02 Discussing the Limits of Confidentiality, 4.05 Disclosures, 6.03 Withholding Records for Nonpayment, and 6.04 Fees and Financial Arrangements. Divisions 22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) and 42 (Independent Practice) have created a joint special interest group for psychologists interested in the topic of disability evaluations. This group is for practitioners who perform disability evaluations, review these evaluations or perform disability determination reviews. Topics of mutual interest would include: criteria for adequate psychological assessment, functional assessment, cultural factors, vendor networks, job accommodation, ethical considerations, use of corroborating information, credentialing and proposed Social Security program changes. If interested, please contact: Ray Conroe, PhD, at ray.conroe@comcast.net Alan D Entin, PhD, ABPP, at adentin@earthlink.net or 804.358.7687(eve) David Niemeier, PhD, at davepsy@earthlink.net or 804.288.1464 Ellen Snoxell, PhD, ABPP, at ellen.snoxell@assurant.com or 800.325.8385, x2960 Here’s a free link that's through the APA that provides the latest news on recently released research: http://www.psycport.com/ and a link on the APA website on finding tests: http://www.apa.org/science/faq-findtests.html#findinfo. Best, |
||||
Please report page problems here. |
Page update:
May 6, 2005
|
|||